I’m  Mehvan Mohammed Hussain

The participation in the military of the Kurds in World War II, 1939-1945, is a controversial issue; therefore, the research tries to expose the role of one of the most important Kurdish soviet characters, who had a great role in the Soviet Union army. When faced with the German army attacks on soviet land during 1941-1945, in addition, it had a role in Kurdistan, Iran with a soviet army in Iran and made connections with the Kurdish movement leaders, and thus recognized his attitude towards the Kurdish issue, this paper researched discover Kurdish soviet citizen roles for defenses to soviet union country through world war II. This research aimed to study two essential sections. First, samand Sibandov effects in the Soviet Union's defenses against the Nazis army during attacks, as a result, he became trustworthy to soviet leaders therefore, he was chosen to lead the military squad, and basic in his role in many battles and his amazing military leadership in world war II especially in Stalingrad battle 1942-1943 he awards many decorations during his military service as well as name a Stalingrad hero. The second section of the study is dedicated to the relationship and samand sibandov attitude towards the Kurdish issue, as well as his connection with Kurdish leadership in Iraq and Iran. The research studies Samand's position towards the Kurdish movement. Did he make an effort or try to changing soviet union attitude about the Kurdish issue? In addition, did he establish relationships between the Kurdish leaders in Iraq, especially Mall Mustapha Barzani, and the soviet union leaders, politicians, and military leadership soviet in northern Iran? The interesting issue is that the Kurdish contemporary references don’t realize Samand Sibandove belongs to the Kurdish nation; therefore, he couldn't elaborate on his attitude towards the Kurdish movement as well as the relationship with the Kurdish leaders’ politicians, but in contrast, he has a good attitude. Therefore, this research academically spends effort to analyze this character's attitude through specific details.

Britain's Position on Military and Logistical Arms Sales to Iraq during the First Year of the Iran-Iraq War 1980-1981. Dr. Mehvan Mohammed Hussain Teacher- Department Of History -Faculty Of Humanities -University of Zakho. Abstract The position of the British government on the Iraqi-Iranian war 1980-1988, especially at its beginning, was of particular importance in drawing the lines of its various relations with the Iraqi government, which at the beginning of the war was in a race against time to provide weapons, ammunition and military equipment from the major industrial countries and their companies in this area. The view of Britain adopting a neutral stance towards the war is difficult from the position of the two sides. The British military-industrial establishment and its companies could not obtain the possible economic benefit from Iraqi offers nor obtain huge deals to buy British weapons. This made Iraqi Ministry of Defense officials press in the negotiations for the signing of many agreements with the British military-industrial establishment, whether with the British Ministry of Defense or with British non-governmental companies. Despite that, many deals took place between the Iraqi Ministry of Defense and the British government, and British companies, as the economic and political factors and pressure groups from within Britain had a significant role in concluding many of the deals. Here it appears clearly how serious the British government is in adopting a policy of neutrality towards the war, especially as the economic factors controlled its decision. In addition, the Iraqi Ministry of Defense is largely credited with breaking many obstacles to benefit from high-quality British military products compared to their French and European counterparts in general. - Key Words (Britain, Iraq, War, Weapons, Company).

The situation of British Government on the Kurdish issue in Iraq , in contemporary history , has had many dimensions ,and it is resulted in a total f result and factors that affecting the Kurds and Kurdistan in different levels . On the other hand the leaders of the modern Kurdish movement tried harder to win the British side during the twentieth century and resorted to several ways to make Bristish government support the movement and stand by its side , but, the leaders of the Kurdish movement did not try to threaten the British civil citizens in the region , or in Iraq or who were visiting or working in Iraq Kurdistan . This is what has been changed slightly after 1975 that is when , on January 30 .1981 , British engineer Micheal Powell was abducted in Sulaimani city by the unified Kurdish Socialist party and the issue of his release took more than a year and a half . there have been numerus attempts by the British government in return : the Kurdish party required a numbers of demands in which the British government demanded to implement in order to grant a freedom to a British citizens Besides , Certain of the Kurdish movement leaders who returned to this mean in which it emerged in the eighties of the last century ,that any threats to the lives of British civil citizens is the Best way to put pressure on countries that have influence and interests in the region .